ejabberd - Comments for "ejabberd 2.0.1 (rereleased) - Bugfixes, R12, PubSub, registration limit" https://www.ejabberd.im/ejabberd-2.0.1 en Cannot replicate your USERS group problem https://www.ejabberd.im/ejabberd-2.0.1#comment-53272 <div class="quote-msg"> <div class="quote-author"><em>Anonymous</em> wrote:</div> <p>On the linux version there seems to be an bug with ldap authentication with Active directory, user needs to be part of user group "USERS" to get authenticated. With the 2.0 version user need not be member of group "USERS" to get authenticated.</p></div> <p>I attempted to replicate this problem using LDAP server.</p> <p>I tried with ejabberd trunk SVN and also with ejabberd 2.0.1 Linux x86 binary installer. I have a user in a test LDAP server, in the organisational unit 'People', and can login correctly.</p> <p>In addition I checked changes in ejabberd source code between 2.0.0 and 2.0.1, and there isn't any change where "USERS" is mentioned.</p> <p>Are you sure it is a bug in ejabberd, and not somewhere else, for example some option in ejabberd.cfg? If you still think it's a bug, do you have any idea why it works for me using LDAP?</p> Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:42:49 +0000 mfoss comment 53272 at https://www.ejabberd.im AD user group: bug tracked https://www.ejabberd.im/ejabberd-2.0.1#comment-53220 <div class="quote-msg"> <div class="quote-author"><em>Anonymous</em> wrote:</div> <p>On the linux version there seems to be an bug with ldap authentication with Active directory, user needs to be part of user group "USERS" to get authenticated. With the 2.0 version user need not be member of group "USERS" to get authenticated.</p></div> <p>Thanks, I've reported it in the bug tracker: <noindex><a href="https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-644" rel="nofollow" >Users need to be in AD group "USERS"</a></noindex></p> Sat, 31 May 2008 17:51:27 +0000 mfoss comment 53220 at https://www.ejabberd.im Win2000Server (CZ) - https://www.ejabberd.im/ejabberd-2.0.1#comment-52440 <p>Win2000Server (CZ) - instalator not run</p> Fri, 23 May 2008 13:56:49 +0000 Anonymous comment 52440 at https://www.ejabberd.im It needs some investigation https://www.ejabberd.im/ejabberd-2.0.1#comment-52438 <div class="quote-msg"> <div class="quote-author"><em>Anonymous</em> wrote:</div> <p>On the linux version there seems to be an bug with ldap authentication with Active directory, user needs to be part of user group "USERS" to get authenticated. With the 2.0 version user need not be member of group "USERS" to get authenticated.</p></div> <p>I'll investigate this in the next days.</p> <div class="quote-msg"> <div class="quote-author"><em>Anonymous</em> wrote:</div> <p>tried testing with the windows version, but seems that the windows installer has an bug, on my laptop with vista i am getting beam_smp.dll not found.</p></div> <p>Thanks for the report. The problem is tracked here: <noindex><a href="https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-637" rel="nofollow" >SMP support on Windows</a></noindex>. There is also a temporary solution so you can use it in the meantime.</p> Fri, 23 May 2008 11:35:05 +0000 mfoss comment 52438 at https://www.ejabberd.im LDAP authentication with AD https://www.ejabberd.im/ejabberd-2.0.1#comment-52433 <p>On the linux version there seems to be an bug with ldap authentication with Active directory, user needs to be part of user group "USERS" to get authenticated. With the 2.0 version user need not be member of group "USERS" to get authenticated. tried testing with the windows version, but seems that the windows installer has an bug, on my laptop with vista i am getting beam_smp.dll not found.</p> Thu, 22 May 2008 09:47:25 +0000 Anonymous comment 52433 at https://www.ejabberd.im