https://www.ejabberd.im/node/4563 en https://www.ejabberd.im/node/4563#comment-57146 <div class="quote-msg"> <div class="quote-author"><em>K0NCTANT1N</em> wrote:</div> <p>Interested patches for Shared Roster Group <noindex><a href="https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-456" rel="nofollow" >EJAB-456</a></noindex>, <noindex><a href="https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-506" rel="nofollow" >EJAB-506</a></noindex>, <noindex><a href="https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-1035" rel="nofollow" >EJAB-1035</a></noindex>, <noindex><a href="https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-1391" rel="nofollow" >EJAB-1391</a></noindex>.</p> <p>There is proposed directive: @template?jid=X@<br /> I will make an example: @template?jid=bo!@<br /> So all bo, bob, bobi, boss and other owe be in that shared roster.</p></div> <p>This was a bad idea. It is useful only to the small server.</p> Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:38:30 +0000 K0NCTANT1N comment 57146 at https://www.ejabberd.im