ejabberd - Comments for "ejabberd_ad - Authentication via Active Directory, vCard and Shared Roster" https://www.ejabberd.im/ejabberd_ad en I mean that it would use https://www.ejabberd.im/ejabberd_ad#comment-51738 <p>I mean that it would use Group LDAP object instead of Department field.<br /> For example I have users Bob, Mary, John which are members of group "Managers". In AD it is simpler to manage members of the group, than manage Department fields of every user.</p> Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:22:55 +0000 uvizhe comment 51738 at https://www.ejabberd.im ejabberd does require to https://www.ejabberd.im/ejabberd_ad#comment-51642 <p>ejabberd does require to fill a Department field. It allows you to manage group of users.<br /> Not sure of what your suggestion is actually.</p> <p>--<br /> Mickaël Rémond<br /> <noindex><a href="http://www.process-one.net/" rel="nofollow" >Process-one</a></noindex></p> Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:54:40 +0000 mremond comment 51642 at https://www.ejabberd.im Can you (or someone else) do this? https://www.ejabberd.im/ejabberd_ad#comment-51641 <p>It would be great if it will create shared groups searching at basedn for AD groups and add them with all their members. Like Openfire do. It is simpler to create a few AD groups and manage them instead of filling 'Department' field for every user.</p> Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:26:53 +0000 uvizhe comment 51641 at https://www.ejabberd.im small trouble. ad auth don't https://www.ejabberd.im/ejabberd_ad#comment-1382 <p>small trouble.<br /> ad auth don't work without special group for jabber users.</p> <p>small patch that solve this problem:</p> <p><noindex><a href="http://immo.ru/temp/ejabberd_ad.patch" title="http://immo.ru/temp/ejabberd_ad.patch" rel="nofollow" >http://immo.ru/temp/ejabberd_ad.patch</a></noindex></p> <p>{no_ad_group, 1} in ejabberd.cfg disable group checking.</p> Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:07:59 +0000 agent_007 comment 1382 at https://www.ejabberd.im